Just when you think the Left’s moral bottom has been reached, Jim Acosta whips out a digital shovel.
The ex-CNN “journalist” turned independent content peddler sat down for what he called an “interview” with Joaquin Oliver, one of the victims of the 2018 Parkland school shooting.
Except Joaquin’s been dead for seven years.
What Acosta interviewed was an AI-generated avatar of the teen — scripted, voiced, and animated to deliver a message from beyond the grave about gun control.
Yes. That actually happened.
And yes, this is the same man — and the same political tribe — that shrieks anytime the right even dares to mention a victim’s name in policy debate. “Don’t politicize tragedy!” they yell.
And then they digitally resurrect a corpse to do their talking for them.
From Fake News to Fake People
Let’s break it down:
Jim Acosta, no longer with CNN but still a self-parody of smarm and self-importance, hosted the AI version of Joaquin Oliver on his new independent show.
The AI Joaquin urged viewers to vote for more gun restrictions, conveniently parroting Acosta’s exact worldview. The whole thing was produced by a group called “The Shotline,” a project literally designed to have murdered children lecture the living on how to vote.
So yeah — not just fake news.
Fake people, fake voices, fake souls.
And Acosta nodded along like it was gospel.
Not journalism.
Not tribute.
Emotional blackmail, wrapped in a digital séance.
Imagine If the Right Did This
Let’s flip this:
Imagine a conservative host creating an AI version of, say, David Dorn, the retired police officer murdered during the BLM riots, and having him “say” things like: “I was killed by lawlessness — vote Republican to restore law and order.”
The left would burn the internet down.
They’d scream exploitation, racism, misinformation, deepfake danger, and every other buzzword their ideology generator could spit out.
But because this was a Parkland victim, and the message was anti-gun, the rules changed.
Now it’s “powerful.”
Now it’s “innovative.”
Now it’s “necessary.”
When Propaganda Wears a Child’s Face
This was never about Joaquin Oliver.
This was never about honoring the dead.
It was about using a dead teenager’s face and name to bypass debate — to guilt you into submission. If you disagree, you’re “fighting with a victim.” If you ask questions, you’re “disrespecting the dead.”
But let’s ask a real question:
Who gave anyone the right to put words in this kid’s mouth?
Did Joaquin say these things when he was alive?
Was there consent?
Or is this just activism disguised as reincarnation?
The Left’s Favorite Weapon: The Weaponized Dead
Acosta and his ilk don’t respect life — or death.
They respect narratives.
And if a deepfake corpse tells the right story, they'll slap a bow on it and call it "journalism."
Meanwhile, the rest of us — the ones who actually believe in real conversations, real policies, and real people — are left shouting into the void while they build their political platform on digital graveyards.
The same people who scream about “disinformation” just broadcasted a computer-generated ghost pushing a partisan message — and then cried when anyone dared call it what it was:
Grotesque.
Final Thought: Jim Acosta Didn’t Just Jump the Shark — He Dug It Up and Gave It AI
You’d think after years of embarrassing grandstanding, Acosta might try to restore a shred of credibility. Instead, he’s building a Black Mirror fanfiction political show, featuring posthumous puppets.
Don’t fall for it.
Don’t let them emotionally manipulate you with ghosts programmed to vote Democrat.
They’ve always said "never let a crisis go to waste."
Now they’ve added: "And if the dead aren’t around to speak for us — we’ll code them."
Post a Comment